Eduardo Andino
In “Money Well Spent: A Strategic Plan for Smart Philanthropy” authors Paul Brest and Hal Harvey offer a vision of strategic philanthropy that is more concerned with social change than selfless love.
When professionalization takes hold of foundations, the historical record—as Wooster makes clear—shows how quickly they become generic.
The recent controversy reminds us of the dangers of globalism at the expense of local community.
What’s the point, Bezos may be asking himself, of giving strategically to change things at a “systems-level,” when I’ve already changed the world at a systems level — and will continue to do so through my businesses?
We are schizophrenic about Zuckerberg. To our zeitgeist, the tech entrepreneur represents salvation. To our humanity, an unsatisfying answer.
If philanthropic elites want to help create bonds of trust in our civic institutions, they will need to do more than just add money to the ideological arms race that already exists.
Is it ironic that at the very time when all we read about is strategic and highly rational philanthropy based on data and results, we would be surprised by a micro-trend like crowdfunding?