< 1 min read

Confusing generosity with justice is at the heart of "The Aspen Consensus", and is the contemporary sale of indulgences, argues Anand Giridharadas.

"The Aspen Consensus, in a nutshell, is this: the winners of our age must be challenged to do more good. But never, ever tell them to do less harm....

"Sometimes I wonder whether these various forms of giving back have become to our era what the papal indulgence was to the Middle Ages: a relatively inexpensive way of getting oneself seemingly on the right of justice, without having to alter the fundamentals of one’s life.

"These systems and structures have victims, and we here are at risk, I think, of confusing generosity toward those victims with justice for those victims. For generosity is a win-win, but justice often is not. The winners of our age don’t enjoy the idea that some of them might actually have to lose, to sacrifice, for justice to be done. In Aspen you don’t hear a lot of ideas involving the privileged and powerful actually being in the wrong, and needing to surrender their status and position for the sake of justice.

"We talk a lot here about giving more. We don’t talk about taking less."--Anand Giridharadas, Medium

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *